یک رویکرد نظریه بازی برای قیمت‌گذاری در یک زنجیره تأمین پایدار با در نظر گرفتن مداخلات دولتی و اثر بازگشتی آب: یک مطالعه موردی محصولات غذایی از ایران

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

ایران، اصفهان، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، دانشکده مهندسی صنایع و سیستم ها

چکیده

در این تحقیق با توجه به کمبود آب در جهان و اهمیت آلودگی زیست‌محیطی فاضلاب، به موضوع آب و تصفیه فاضلاب در زنجیره تأمین پرداخته شده است. پرداخت سوبسید دولتی برای تشویق تولیدکننده به تصفیه فاضلاب پیشنهاد شده است. تصفیه فاضلاب و فروش فاضلاب تصفیه‌شده برای استفاده مجدد منجر به ایجاد اثر بازگشتی حاصل از افزایش کارایی آب می‌شود که میزان مصرف آب تازه را برای تولید بالا می‌برد. با توجه به نقش همزمان دولت و تولیدکننده در این زمینه و تأثیر تصمیمات آن‌ها روی هم، رویکرد نظریه بازی برای قیمت‌گذاری محصول سبز استفاده شده است. تحلیل نتایج و حل یک مثال واقعی از صنعت لبنیات ایران نشان داد که با توجه به هدف دولت برای کاهش آلودگی زیست‌محیطی و کاهش مصرف آب در بخشی که پساب تصفیه‌شده استفاده می‌شود، معمولا تصفیه فاضلاب برای هر دو بازیکن دولت و تولیدکننده، سود بیشتری نسبت به تصفیه نکردن فاضلاب دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Game-Theoretic Approach for Pricing in a Sustainable Supply Chain Considering Governmental Intervention and Water Rebound Effect: A Case Study of Iranian Food Products

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Rezaei
  • Naser Mollaverdi Isfahani
  • Morteza Rasti Barzoki
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Escalating freshwater depletion and contamination driven by anthropogenic activities significantly threaten global water accessibility, jeopardizing food security, environmental integrity, and economic prosperity. The dearth of water resources worldwide and the significance of the adverse effects of wastewater pollution on the environment have promoted the discussion of water and wastewater treatment in the supply chain in this research. A subsidy has been proposed to encourage producers to treat wastewater to create a sustainable supply chain. The government will determine the subsidy. Wastewater generated during the production process undergoes treatment and is subsequently marketed for reuse within the supply chain. Wastewater treatment coupled with the reuse of treated wastewater in the supply chain effectively reduces freshwater consumption. Subsequently, the green manufacturer determines the selling price of each green product unit by considering the cost of wastewater treatment, the rise in fresh water consumption due to the rebound effect, and the impact of the amount of government subsidy for wastewater treatment. Given the concurrent roles of the government and the green producer within this domain and the impact of their decisions on each other, the game theory approach has been employed for the first time for pricing the green product under the mentioned conditions. This holistic approach offers a more realistic appraisal of freshwater consumption in production and paves the way for formulating effective water management strategies towards sustainable production. In this study, the designed game has been solved under two structures, namely Nash and Stackelberg. A parametric analysis of the parameters of the problem is conducted. A real-life case study from the food industry of Iran is solved. The analysis of the results revealed that wastewater treatment for both the government and the green producer as players in both structures generally yield higher profits than not treating wastewater.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainable Supply Chain
  • Water Rebound Effect
  • Pricing
  • Game theory

مراجع

   1. World Commission on Environment and Development., 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Shrivastava, P., 1995. The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20, pp. 936-960. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280026.
3. Cetinkaya, B., Cuthbertson, R., Ewer, G., Klaas-Wissing, T., Piotrowicz, W. and Tyssen, C., 2011. Sustainable supply chain management: practical ideas for moving towards best practice, Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12023-7.
4/ Zhou, Y. and Qin, F., 2015. A review of sustainable supply chain management based on game theory. International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing and Industrial Application. Atlantis Press, pp. 18-22. https://doi.org/10.2991/icamia-15.2015.5.
5.Kovács, G. and Illés, B., 2019. Development of an optimization method and software for optimizing global supply chains for increased efficiency, competitiveness, and sustainability. Sustainability, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061610.
6.Rajeev, A., Pati, R. K., Padhi, S. S. and Govindan, K., 2017. Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 162, pp. 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.026.
7.Kovács, G. and Kot, S., 2016. New logistics and production trends as the effect of global economy changes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14, pp. 115-126.
8.Chen, J.-Y., Dimitrov, S. and Pun, H., 2019. The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation. Omega, 86, pp. 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.012.
9.Mahmoudi, R. and Rasti-Barzoki, M., 2018. Sustainable supply chains under government intervention with a real-world case study: An evolutionary game theoretic approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 116, pp. 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.028.
10.Xing, G., Xia, B. and Guo, J., 2019. Sustainable cooperation in the green supply chain under financial constraints. Sustainability, 11, 5977. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215977.
11.Falkenmark, M., Rockström, J. and Karlberg, L., 2009. Present and future water requirements for feeding humanity. Food Security, 1, pp. 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-008-0003-x.
12.Ercin, E., 2018. Overuse of Water Resources: Water Stress and The Implications for Food and Agriculture. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21998-7.
13.De Fraiture, C. and Wichelns, D., 2010. Satisfying future water demands for agriculture. Agricultural Water Management, 97, pp. 502-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.08.008.
14. Siyal, A. W., Gerbens-Leenes, P. and Vaca-Jiménez, S., 2023. Freshwater competition among agricultural, industrial, and municipal sectors in a water-scarce country. Lessons of Pakistan's fifty-year development of freshwater consumption for other water-scarce countries. Water Resources and Industry, 29, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2023.100206.
15.Dai, Z., Aqlan, F., Zheng, X. and Gao, K., 2018. A location-inventory supply chain network model using two heuristic algorithms for perishable products with fuzzy constraints. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 119, pp. 338-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.007.
16. Brar, A., Kumar, M. and Pareek, N., 2019. Comparative appraisal of biomass production, remediation, and bioenergy generation potential of microalgae in dairy wastewater. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 443920. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00678.
17.Choi, H.-J., 2016. Dairy wastewater treatment using microalgae for potential biodiesel application. Environmental Engineering Research, 21, pp. 393-400. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2015.151.
18.Chokshi, K., Pancha, I., Ghosh, A. and Mishra, S., 2016. Microalgal biomass generation by phycoremediation of dairy industry wastewater: An integrated approach towards sustainable biofuel production. Bioresource Technology, 221, pp. 455-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.070.
19. Sharshir, S. W., Algazzar, A. M., Elmaadawy, K., Kandeal, A., Elkadeem, M., Arunkumar, T., Zang, J. and Yang, N., 2020. New hydrogel materials for improving solar water evaporation, desalination and wastewater treatment: A review. Desalination, 491, 114564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114564.
20. Slavov, A. K., 2017. Dairy wastewaters–general characteristics and treatment possibilities–a review. Food Technol. Biotechnol, 55, 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.17113/ftb.55.01.17.4520.
21. Wang, C., Jiang, L., Hu, M., Wang, C., Peng, Y., Zhang, S. and Qi, W., 2023. Long-term performance of ZVI-stimulating anaerobic/aerobic system-PEI modified ceramic membrane SMBR in reusing food wastewater for irrigation: An industrial project and microbial community shift. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 56, 104261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104261.
22. He, J., Xia, S., Li, W., Deng, J., Lin, Q. and Zhang, L., 2023. Resource recovery and valorization of food wastewater for sustainable development: An overview of current approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 347, 119118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119118.
23. Al-Hazmi, H. E., Mohammadi, A., Hejna, A., Majtacz, J., Esmaeili, A., Habibzadeh, S., Saeb, M. R., Badawi, M., Lima, E. C.  and Mąkinia, J., 2023. Wastewater treatment for reuse in agriculture: Prospects and challenges. Environmental Research, 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116711.
24.Kothari, R., Pathak, V. V., Kumar, V. and Singh, D., 2012. Experimental study for growth potential of unicellular alga Chlorella pyrenoidosa on dairy waste water: an integrated approach for treatment and biofuel production. Bioresource Technology, 116, pp. 466-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.121.
25. Sekar, A. D., Jayabalan, T., Muthukumar, H., Chandrasekaran, N. I., Mohamed, S. N. and Matheswaran, M., 2019. Enhancing power generation and treatment of dairy waste water in microbial fuel cell using Cu-doped iron oxide nanoparticles decorated anode. Energy, 172, pp. 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.102.
26. Yaakob, Z., Ali, E., Zainal, A., Mohamad, M. and Takriff, M. S., 2014. An overview: biomolecules from microalgae for animal feed and aquaculture. Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki, 21, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2241-5793-21-6.
27.Najar-Almanzor, C. E., Velasco-Iglesias, K. D., Nunez-Ramos, R., Uribe-Velázquez, T., Solis-Bañuelos, M., Fuentes-Carrasco, O. J., Chairez, I., García-Cayuela, T. and Carrillo-Nieves, D., 2023. Microalgae-assisted green bioremediation of food-processing wastewater: A sustainable approach toward a circular economy concept. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118774.
28.Gramegna, G., Scortica, A., Scafati, V., Ferella, F., Gurrieri, L., Giovannoni, M., Bassi, R., Sparla, F., Mattei, B. and Benedetti, M., 2020. Exploring the potential of microalgae in the recycling of dairy wastes. Bioresource Technology Reports, 12, 100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100604.
 
29. Haddon, A., Rapaport, A., Roux, S. and Harmand, J., 2023. Model based optimization of fertilization with treated wastewater reuse. Advances in Water Resources, 181, 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104561.
30.Hosney, H., Tawfik, M. H., Duker, A. and Van Der Steen, P., 2023. Prospects for treated wastewater reuse in agriculture in low-and middle-income countries: Systematic analysis and decision-making trees for diverse management approaches. Environmental Development, 46, 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100849.
31.Shrivastava, V., Ali, I., Marjub, M. M., Rene, E. R. and Soto, A. M. F., 2022. Wastewater in the food industry: Treatment technologies and reuse potential. Chemosphere, 293, 133553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133553
32.Waldron, K. W., 2009. Handbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing, Elsevier.
33.Li, K., Liang, S., Liang, Y., Feng, C., Qi, J., Xu, L. and Yang, Z., 2021. Mapping spatial supply chain paths for embodied water flows driven by food demand in China. Science of the Total Environment, 786, 147480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147480.
34.Ummalyma, S. B. and Sukumaran, R. K., 2014. Cultivation of microalgae in dairy effluent for oil production and removal of organic pollution load. Bioresource Technology, 165, pp. 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.028.
35.Aootu, F. N., 2019. Overview of global dairy market develop ments in 2018. Dairy Market Review. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/ca3879en.
36. Al-Saidi, M., Das, P. and Saadaoui, I., 2021. Circular economy in basic supply: Framing the approach for the water and food sectors of the Gulf cooperation council countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, pp. 1273-1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.004.
37.Mahmoumgonbadi, A., 2023. Strategic Planning of Circular Supply Chains with Multiple Downgraded Market Levels: A Methodological Proposal. University of Sheffield.
38. Jafarnejad, E., Makui, A., Hafezalkotob, A. and Aghsami, A., 2024. Governance intervention policies in the production competition of biofuels and fossil fuels: a pathway to sustainable development. Operations Management Research, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-024-00441-z.
39. Safarzadeh, S., Rasti-Barzoki, M. and Hejazi, S. R., 2020. A review of optimal energy policy instruments on industrial energy efficiency programs, rebound effects, and government policies. Energy Policy, 139, 111342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111342.
40.Kong, L., Hu, G., Mu, X., Li, G. and Zhang, Z., 2023. The energy rebound effect in households: Evidence from urban and rural areas in Beijing. Applied Energy, 343, 121151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121151.
41.Sonnberger, M. and Gross, M., 2018. Rebound effects in practice: an invitation to consider rebound from a practice theory perspective. Ecological Economics, 154, pp. 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.013.
42.York, R. and Mcgee, J. A., 2016. Understanding the Jevons paradox. Environmental Sociology, 2, pp. 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2015.1106060.
43. Du, K., Liu, X. and Zhao, C., 2023. Environmental regulation mitigates energy rebound effect. Energy Economics, 125, 106851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106851.
44. Safarzadeh, S., Rasti-Barzoki, M., Hejazi, S. R. and Piran, M. J., 2020. A game theoretic approach for the duopoly pricing of energy-efficient appliances regarding innovation protection and social welfare. Energy, 200, 117517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117517.
45.Lou, Z., Lou, X. and Dai, X., 2020. Game-theoretic models of green products in a two-echelon dual-channel supply chain under government subsidies. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2425401.
46.Song, J., Guo, Y., Wu, P. and Sun, S., 2018. The agricultural water rebound effect in China. Ecological Economics, 146, pp. 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.016.
47.Berbel, J., Gutiérrez-Martín, C. and Expósito, A., 2018. Impacts of irrigation efficiency improvement on water use, water consumption and response to water price at field level. Agricultural Water Management, 203, pp. 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.026.
48.Manteghi, Y., Arkat, J., Mahmoodi, A. and Farvaresh, H., 2021. Competition and cooperation in the sustainable food supply chain with a focus on social issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124872.
49.Xie, G., Yue, W., Liu, W. and Wang, S., 2012. Risk based selection of cleaner products in a green supply chain. Pacific Journal of Optimization, 8, pp. 473-484.
50. Bani Taba, S. M. R., 2021. A sharp decrease in per capita consumption of dairy products in Iran / increasing demand for yogurt-based dairy products [Online]. Moj News Agency. Available: https://www.mojnews.com/n/1vD9. [In Persian].
51.Asr Iran News Analysis, W., 2016. Survey of yogurt consumption per capita in Iran and the world and the role of Seven yogurt [Online]. Available: https://www.asriran.com/001xa9. [In Persian].
52. Regional Water Company of Qazvin., 2020. Tariff rate for water consumption in 2020 [Online]. Available: https://www.qzrw.ir/st/400. [In Persian].
53. Eskenasi, H. and Alamatian, E., 2015. Investigating the amount of water consumption and the conversion rate of water to wastewater in industry (a case study of food industry in Razavi Khorasan province). National conference on civil engineering and needs-oriented research. https://civilica.com/doc/461175. [In Persian].
54. Iran Water Industry., 2022. The cost of supplying each cubic meter of water from deep sources is 2.5 euros [Online]. Bazar. Available: www.tahlilbazaar.com/x3mDG. [In Persian].
55. Farsi Rad, S., 2020. Iran Water and Wastewater Treatment Company (The former Fenoman) [Online]. Available: https://tavfi.ir/. [In Persian].
56. Ghorbani, F., 2019. Water consumption reduction project in Kale Amol dairy factory [Online]. Specialized Meeting and Exhibition of Water Scarcity Adaptation. First National Dehydration Adaptation Event, Experiences in the Industry Sector. https://www.mccima.com/files/agriculture/%d8%b5%d9%86%d8%a7%db%8c%d8%b9.pdf. [In Persian].
57.Bani Taba, S. M. R., 2022. The chaotic state of the dairy products market/ an economic expert: the per capita consumption of dairy products by Iranians has reached below 70 kg [Online]. Etemad Online. Available: https://www.etemadonline.com/tiny/news-625518. [In Persian].
58. Hasanpour, B., 2019. Calculation of water price and sewage disposal cost [Online]. Water and Wastewater Company: East Azarbaijan Province. Available: https://abfaazarbaijan.ir/?pageid=0. [In Persian].
59.Abnikco. 2021., Dairy wastewater treatment [Online]. Nik Pouyan Alborz Water Treatment Engineering Company. Available: https://abnikco.com/. [In Persian].
60. Mehr News Agency., 2019. The specific goods and services that are exempt from value added tax have been identified. [Online]. Available: mehrnews.com/xR2J7. [In Persian].
مهندسی صنایع و مدیریت
دوره 40، شماره 2
اسفند 1403
صفحه 111-125

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار